Hey is there any chance u could do a similar test for sbr’s, or do u believe the results would pretty much b the same, regardless of barrel length? For multiple reasons. New price – $85 – Griffin Armament M4SD Hammer Comp Sort by. Length: 2.44″ Yup, Strike makes some awesome values. A2 was included in the 1st and 2nd muzzle brake test, and I didn’t do it again here. Because at an average of $100 a pop, you better hope you like the one you pick. Finish: Salt Bath Nitride (QPQ) Apparently they don’t realize that the height of this rail is way lower than AR rail height, and it would be basically impossible to jury rig a sight onto this thing at a usable height. According to the strict letter of the law, this is necessary to render a rifle featureless (i.e. My 20″ wears a KAW linear comp and noticeably reduces concussion and noise at the shooter’s ear and spectators to the sides. Keep up the great work, it is much appreciated! The rifle I want already comes with a suppressor, but I’m not even sure if it comes off. Thanks in advance for replying, if you do. As with all of the brakes and flash hiders I’ve had from SureFire, machining and finish are totally flawless. Material: HTSR 416 stainless steel We also crowned a new champion; one that I’m going to have to purchase in case there’s a test #4 in the cards. All of those companies make unsubstantiated claims about the recoil reduction of their brakes and for many of us that could be the deciding factor on which suppressor we end up buying since all of these cans are coming to within a few Db of each other as the technology improves. A muzzle brake or recoil compensator is a device connected to, or a feature integral to the construction of, the muzzle or barrel of a firearm or cannon that is intended to redirect a portion of propellant gases to counter recoil and unwanted muzzle rise. Clearly, a lot of people find the triangular shape compelling and wanted to know how the recoil reduction stacks up. But compared to the standard muzzle brake, the hybrid device, which features asymmetric venting through tiny holes, also provides a 50% drop in volume at the shooter and a 25% reduction in the flash signature downrange with a minimal weight increase. MSRP: $74. RAC ’em up! IMHO the best muzzle device would be one that keeps the rifle as undisturbed from neutral (X, Y, and Z axes) as possible? Diameter (at largest point): 0.866″ Of course, there are still ways around it and honestly, I’d prefer to tolerate the inconsiderate assholes as part of the price of freedom. That is unheard of around me. I liked it because that shows how clustered the brakes are on cost, yet widely distributed on quality. (I’m aware it would most likely require threading at least some of the barrel end.). My only other option is to have the threads cut off and the barrel crowned (I have plenty of length) as the best solution. Diameter (at largest point): 1.081″ I have read all of the tests and I appreciate all the great information as I like to read a lot before making any purchases for my rifles. $24.99. Ultra Light 308 Aluminum Muzzle Brake 5/8x24 Compensator w/ Washer for .308. thread_newbie 1 point 2 points 3 points 1 year ago . Please call with you need it sized for anything more than 338. Material: steel I’d want to know more (time for more research on our part) about chamber pressures and the associated potential bore pressure at “cork pop” as the projectile breaks the muzzle plane for any given caliber/barrel length (for example, 5.56 M855 has a chamber pressure approaching 58,000 psi, and a bore pressure at the “pop of the cork” at 16,000 psi for a 7.5″ barrel, 11,000 psi for a 10.5″ barrel, and 7,500 psi at 16″) Weight: 2.983 oz Surefire 870 Grip BY Surefire 870 Grip in Articles Surefire 870 Grip Reviews : Get best Surefire 870 Grip With Quality. But if you decline, I’ll certainly understand. A high-pressure poodle-shooting round made much louder with a brake, with little net gain for the shooter. As the protocol remained the same as before, we’ll keep the description of it quick. Weight: 5.679 oz Diameter (at largest point): 1.042″ Perhaps it was to focus on recoil reduction solely but I found it interesting to watch muzzle rise in the previous two. Turned out I was completely wrong, not only of the result but of the SJC’s build. Thoughts? Click here to jump to its point in the video, and here for the additional M4-72 vs. Titan back-to-back testing. You can find the first one here, the second one there, and a .30 caliber version here.